November 15th, 2023: 4th Report
November 15th, 2023
Dear Family
and friends,
Report
number four.
Family
updates: There’s no news to report. The mobilized nephews remain mobilized. There
probably aren’t any adult Israeli adults without third-degree acquaintances
killed in this war; in my case it’s a number of 2nd-degree
relations. Friends who have lost friends or relatives. The killing and dying
continue.
You may
recall the unit of reservists who piled into what were essentially stolen tanks
and raced into battle on October 7th, even before they were
officially mobilized. I mentioned they did have their battalion commander with them.
Lt. Col. Salman Habeka, a 33-year-old Druze career officer, then cobbled his
regular unit back into formation, and eventually led the charge into Gaza, where
he was killed. My friend Guy, my source, tells me the death of their commander
was a real blow. He had been charismatic and popular.
We had a
“funny” experience last week. Before we drove down to the weekly visit with the
grandchildren, Achikam briefed us on bomb shelter options. Sarah asked what
would happen if the siren went off precisely while we were transferring the
kids home. Achikam and I both said that wouldn’t happen. Hamas shoots at Tel Aviv in the early evening,
not 4pm. Sarah insisted. Sure enough, at 4pm we picked up Itamar, and just as
we were fastening his seatbelt – off went the sirens. Yesterday the siren went
off at 5:15, while Sophie was in a gym group. In the turmoil of 50 parents and
children streaming into the bomb shelter we lost sight of Itamar – instead of
waiting for us he had raced in ahead. Fragments of a rocket that was shot down
by Iron Dome landed in a playground a few miles south of us and seriously
wounded a man who hadn’t run to shelter.
I recognize
that in the grander scheme of things, air-raid sirens going off when you’ve got
shelter are not a big thing.
We have
roughly 200,000 internal refugees. Thousands of them are survivors of October 7th.
Another 100,000 live far enough from Gaza that no Hamas invaders reached them,
but their neighborhoods are under constant rocket barrages. And then we have
the 80,000-some civilians along the Lebanese border who’ve left because
Hezbollah is shooting at their homes. (These refugees are still under rockets,
from Hamas or from the Houthis in Yemen who are shooting at Eilat – but two or
four daily sirens are small change). In a country of ten million, each 100,000
is a precent point, which means that at the moment, 3.5% of the population is
mobilized and 2% are refugees.
The refugees
are in hotels. It first that sounds pretty good, but it turns out that putting
entire families in single hotel room for an indefinite period is extremely
demoralizing. Uprooted, unemployed, in limbo. Hanging their laundry on the
balconies of luxury hotels. My brother-in-law Yossie has volunteered to work
with them at one of the hotels. Yesterday he asked me to come by to help him
with something. While I was there, he had a brief conversation with a stocky
man in in his late 40s with three small children. After they wandered off,
Yossie told me there are another three children, teenagers. The man and his
wife are in the middle of a divorce, she’s refused to stay in Jerusalem, he’s
rootless and helpless, and now he’s also the single father of three small kids
who are detached from their home and lives. He looked as lost as you can
imagine.
Today I
walked by a very fancy, brand-new hotel that was about to open in our
neighborhood. It’s full of refugees. They’ve decorated their hotel-room windows
with yellow balloons, demanding in solidarity that the hostages come home. (As
in “Tie a Yellow Ribbon Round the Old Oak Tree”). At the entrance there was a
large mourning notice about one of the soldiers who was killed last week. His
homeless family is sitting shiva at the hotel.
It could
just as easily have been a mourning notice for someone killed on October 7th,
given how the identification of the remains is still ongoing. There are teams
of archeologists down near Gaza, sifting through destroyed homes and ashes
looking for human remains. Teeth, say, or charred remains of a large bone. They’ve
identified at least ten remains, so we know those missing people are dead, not
kidnapped. For a while the authorities were using the tracking devices attached
to hawks and vultures, to identify fields where they were circling around human
remains.
Even if all
the hostages eventually come home, dozens of bodies may never be found.
Will they ever
return? Are they even alive? Hamas hasn’t offered information, and certainly
hasn’t allowed the International Red Cross to visit them, as the laws of war
require. But what about our own government? In the first few days after October
7th our leaders made no secret of their decision to put the
destruction of Hamas over saving the children, mothers, seniors, women, men, or
any of the IDF soldiers being held in Gaza. Our government has some very
callous people, but it was a bit astonishing how they didn’t even try to cloak
their decision in political-mumbo-jumbo-speak.
Then the
pushback started. You can’t be a government that fails to defend its citizens
from genocidal marauders, and then write off the citizens held by the
marauders. So now we’re deep into the mumbo-jumbo-speak, and at every
opportunity our leadership – government and military – promises they’re going
to achieve two contradictory goals. They’re going to destroy Hamas, including
thousands of its men and leaders who are hiding in hundreds of miles of
tunnels, and they’re going to free hundreds of hostages from the same tunnels.
I desperately hope they’ll succeed, but I don’t see how. So my body takes the
minimum hours of sleep it needs, and I awake before dawn and think of the horrors.
Some
experts say the public clamor for the hostages raises the price of their
freedom. The government has proved that, at least initially, it didn’t care. Some
American officials say the negotiations are advancing. Some pundits say a
temporary ceasefire will enable hostages to be freed; others swear it will
allow Hamas to regroup and move them.
We’ve
decided to go with our consciences, which means standing with the families. For
a while there was a heart-rending display at City Hall. Hundreds of beds, each
one unique in how it portrayed the person who abruptly abandoned it. An open
book. A teddy bear. A Batman blanket. A baby rocker. Discarded socks. Orphaned reading
glasses. One evening Sarah and I went together, and people were singing in two
corners of the wide plaza. A group of orthodox young women, singing religious
passages. Across from them a mostly secular group, singing the cannon of
Israeli songs of mourning. Eventually a young man took a microphone and said
this would be the last event where they’d sing; from now on we’re going to be
disruptive and angry. Then a women told of her lost family, of her frustration
and despair: she, too, told us the time for soulful songs was long past.
The thought
of responding to horror with more horror tortures me. A few weeks ago I even
published a couple of (Hebrew) op-eds calling for us to incentivize the
peace-seeking parts of the Palestinians. But not yet, as even I have come to
understand. There really does need to be a violent response to the genocidal
Hamas attack.
First,
because the frightened and furious Israeli public has to respond with all its
might. The only possible response to the Hamas massacre is to rain destruction
on it. The damage to the Jewish psyche, given Jewish history, demands it. Zionism
was always based on the idea that Jewish helplessness must end. What marks us
off from the old Jews is that we fight back and destroy. I cannot
over-emphasize how strong this commandment is. If we don’t avenge the blood of
October 7th, we’ll have failed one of our basic reasons for
existence. It’s not pretty, but that’s our inheritance. It’s why so many
Israelis raced into battle on October 7th, literally throwing their
bodies into the fire. We don’t allow marauders to rampage. We stop them, and we
kill them. For what it’s worth, most of the perpetrators of October 7th
are already dead, and the rest soon will be.
But it’s
not all vengeance. As I write this Hezbollah has been hovering for 6 weeks
around the decision to do what it has always said it would, and attack us with
their 150,000 rockets. One reason they’re hesitating is surely those American
aircraft carriers. Another is that when they provoked us in 2006 we responded
with such force and destruction that they’ve yet to recover. Their leader,
Hassan Nassrallah, has lived in a tunnel ever since; after that summer he
publicly said he would never have provoked us had he only known. By pulverizing
Gaza today we’re telling him, loud and clear, that this time we’ll be far more violent.
It remains to see if this message prevails over his other motivations. If so,
our ferocity in 2006 will have saved the lives of tens of thousands of Israelis
and Lebanese in 2023.
The English
word for this is deterrence. Even peace lovers need to recognize its power and
importance in human affairs.
Finally,
there’s the matter of intentions and abilities. There are strands of the
Palestinian people who will always wish us evil, no matter what, and will
strive to end our existence. Irrespective of the policies we chose. (For
decades we’ve been choosing bad ones). The only possible way of dealing with
those impulses is by neutering their practical power. If they preach hate in
some of the mosques, we may have to live with it. If they arm themselves, we
have no choice but to disarm them. Violently, if necessary. All Israelis have
always known this, but too many of us, myself included, haven’t prioritized it
enough. This was a fatal mistake. Right now there really isn’t any alternative
to destroying Hamas’ capability to harm us, unless it be that we give up and
leave. So: No alternative.
I once
wrote a whole book about jus ad bellum, and jus in bello. The
justification for going to war, and the way of waging a just war. This war is a
justified as they come. Are we waging it justly, given how Hamas has embedded
itself within the populace? Many Israelis don’t give a damn at the moment, or
so they claim, but the army says it does. And at times of national crises and
full mobilization, the army is the people. It’s not a separate entity.
I wish I
was convinced of the answer.
The IDF has
surprised us. Rather than charge into Gaza and bloody urban combat – the most
lethal form of warfare ever invented – they’ve been slow, methodical and
careful. They encouraged a million Palestinian civilians to move south, and in
recent days they’ve been defending the laggards who still want to leave, from
the fire of Hamas who doesn’t want them to. Even the BBC – the BBC, for crying
out loud – has been reporting about Arabic-speaking Israeli officers phoning
Gazan residents and staying on the line until they’re certain the last
civilians have left buildings that are about to be attacked. The leaders of
hospitals have been having long negotiations with IDF officers. The IDF is
determined to take the hospitals and show the world what’s under them – but not
until they’re almost empty. This is an army worried about collateral damage.
Yet there’s
another side to the story. I previously recommended a chapter from a New York
Times podcast, where Sabrina Tavernese talked to a man who defended his family
in Beeri. Since then, she’s done some more podcasts about our war. She’s not an
antisemite, nor an enemy of Israel. She’s a journalist, and her output is
professional and reasonable, including the parts I disagree with. Yesterday I
forced myself to listen to every minute of her talks with hospital doctors in
Gaza. It was
devastating. The desperation in their voices, the exhaustion, and the
hopelessness. You can hear the screams in the background, including the six-year-old
girl whose foot needs to be amputated. Itamar will be six in a few weeks, so I
know about six-year-olds. They’ve got a new medical category, WCNSF: Wounded
Child No Surviving Family. Some of these WCNSFs are too young to know the names
of their family, so even if they still have relatives, they’ll never be found.
Not in the chaos that is Gaza right now.
Are the
doctors dissimulating? Don’t they know that Hamas is holding innocent Israeli
hostages, including children, under their hospital, surrounded by Hamas
fighters and leaders? Don’t they see the armed Hamas men in the corridors, and
haven’t they heard how Hamas is using violence to prevent the evacuation of
civilians and of the hospitals themselves? Don’t any of them have Hamas members
among their own social circles or even families?
But you
see, that’s all irrelevant. Actually, according to the laws of war, it’s very
relevant, because putting military forces into hospitals (or schools, or
mosques, or homes) makes those places legitimate targets. That’s the law. But
what has the law got to do with the six-year-old in agony, or the ten-year-old
who couldn’t be saved because the hole in his skull was too big, or the many WCNSFs?
Some of
Gaza’s traumatized young children will live another 80 years, or 90, at least
the ones who survive all the future rounds of violence. Can Israel glean any
conceivable advantage from today’s traumas surviving all the way into the next
century?
I apologize
for the moral whiplash. Reality demands
the ability to hold totally irreconcilable thoughts simultaneously, even if
this is unpopular in top universities.
As this
long and meandering report nears its end, I’ll note parts of the tale I’m
leaving for possible future chapters. Our post-war reckonings. The possibilities
for the future. Israel’s relations with the rest of the Jews.
Earlier
today I went for a shiva visit with the family of Eliyahu Binyamin Elmakais, a
soldier from France who immigrated alone. His parents came for the Shiva. When
I walked in, they were conversing with Rubi Rivlin, who was our previous President,
and remains popular. In his most famous speech, in 2015, he bemoaned how we
split into four tribes: Secular, Ultra-orthodox, Modern-orthodox (those are the
ideological settlers), and Arabs. Perhaps I should have added a fifth, he mused
this morning: World Jewry. Almost 300,000 Jews demonstrating in Washington DC,
he said – that’s an important tribe, and we must re-connect with them.
Israel is poised
to change dramatically; Rivlin is correct the process needs to include the
cousins who’ve been drifting apart.
****
The Library
and the Tent: A Metaphor
The
library: More than 20 years ago the folks at the National Library began a
process of re-invention and renewal. The culmination of their efforts was
supposed to take place last month, with the public opening of their
spanking-new building, which is across the street from the Knesset, down the
hill from the Supreme Court, a block away from the Prime Minister’s Office –
and also, right next to the Ministry of Finance. The Israel Museum is across
another street, and the line between the Shrine of the Book, which houses the
world’s oldest copies of the Bible, and the new National Library, is a few
hundred feet. The view from the windows is of the Hebrew University.
Not every
major architectural project ends satisfactorily. You can spend $100M on a white
elephant. I sat on the Library’s Public Council when they chose the architect
(Herzog and De Meuron of Zurich), and had my doubts. Well, I
was wrong. The building is beautiful. It’s impressive. It makes you want to sit
and study, to stand and discuss, or to wander and think. The gala opening
ceremonies, scheduled for October, were all canceled, but a friend who’s been
sitting there since it opened said to me simply: Wow! Magnificent!
Jerusalem
is a richer place because of its new library. (It was already rich).
The tent:
Last week a small group of people who’ve just lost family set up a tent across
from the Knesset. Their intention is to apply the model of Motti Ashkenazi, a
young captain who returned from the battles of 1973, set in front of Golda
Meir’s office in February 1974, and refused to move until her government fell
in May. Along the way he gathered around him ever-growing numbers of
protestors, until there were many thousands. The protestors of 2023 say they
will stay until Netanyahu is gone.
When I
visited them the other day, a few dozen people were milling around. Some were
constructing a plank floor under the tent, so as not to lie on the pavement
when the rainy season starts. (Yesterday). Some grandmothers were knitting wool
hats for the soldiers who will be out in the rain. Organizers were organizing. Some
of us sat around and argued: Is it was too soon for the masses to join, given
the missing 5.5% of the populace, or maybe we can’t afford to wait a single
day. I’m of the we-need-to-wait-a-moment-camp – but there I was, at the tent of
the we’re-finished-waiting-camp.
After an
hour or so I wandered back to the new library – a 90-second walk. The center of
the building is a gigantic open space, five or six stories high, around which
are thousands of books and hundreds of tables, light by the largest skylight
window you’ve ever seen. Since the previous time I’d been there, last week, the
staff had placed hundreds of chairs in circles around the space, each with a
name, age and picture of a hostage. On most of the chairs they’d placed books,
books somehow relevant to the missing individual. A book about a football club
on the chair of someone who looks likely to be a football fan. An adventure
story on the chair of a 21-year-old man. A famous biography on the chair of an elderly
woman. The children’s book Yael’s House on the chair of three-year-old Yahel
Shoham. A cardboard-paged story of Pluto the Dog, a classic all Israeli
children have loved, on the high-chair of 9-month-old Kfir Bibas. It’s
impossible to look without weeping – at least internally if you’re a stoic
grown-up.
And the
metaphor: I think it’s obvious. There are the ancient Dead Sea Scrolls, among
the oldest documents in the world. In the next room are some of the oldest
codex books in the world, including one that was owned by Maimonides himself 850 years ago. They’re all in Hebrew, they were all written
within 200 miles of Jerusalem, and now they’re in the Israel Museum. Across the
street there’s a super-modern 21st Century library, the national
library of the people of the book. Next to them both is a tent of angry
survivors, reeling from the worst massacre of Jews in almost 80 years; the
library itself has a heart-rending display of agony.
In the long
term, the scrolls and the library will remain. The tent and the despair will
pass into the books.
Yaacov
Comments
Post a Comment